Watch the video. There is nothing all that radical in it. Mostly common sense and common knowledge.
You: Freeman is old and stupid.
Me: Ok, so are you by that measure.
Mick: Freeman is old and stupid. I am a scientist.
Me: Again, so are you and so is Freemen, but 3 times a scientist.
Mick goes on to cite deforestation, blah blah which is true but genetic engineering of more efficient trees is a Freeman theory. We also might insist on mechanical deforestation even though it is a renewable resource.
Nobody doubts climate change. It is the effect of human activity I don't know, you don't know, Mick doesn't know and Freeman doesn't know. Go ask any climatologist how long it takes Co2 to return to ground level. I don't remember the exact figure but even a radical environmentalist like David Suzuki cites 5-85% returns to ground in between 2 and 200 years. This is what climatologists are predicting imminent doom with. It is BS science. BTW, Many years ago, David Suzuki's daughter did a Greta like death and destruction UN presentation. She is now in her 40-s with kids, a nice house, cars to drive and oceans to fish. Nothing she said would happen did. It isn't even a blip on the radar.