So, performance metrics have their place.

[MoseySusan]

We can easily meet the 350 new topics metric when we leverage our experiences across topic fields. 
If there are +\- 30 people cycling through here throughout the day, and there are 13 topic fields, then each person need contribute only 11.667 new topics across all fields. That’s a topic per field rate of .879 per person. And I know all y’all have at least 11.7 instances of slightly less than fully-formed ideas to contribute. 
So, get to creating that content! 

[shootingstar]

17 minutes ago, MoseySusan said:

We can easily meet the 350 new topics metric when we leverage our experiences across topic fields. 
If there are +\- 30 people cycling through here throughout the day, and there are 13 topic fields, then each person need contribute only 11.667 new topics across all fields. That’s a topic per field rate of .879 per person. And I know all y’all have at least 11.7 instances of slightly less than fully-formed ideas to contribute. 
So, get to creating that content! 

Please verify where you got those metrics.   This would be exciting for those winning the popularity contest.

[Wilbur ★]

2 minutes ago, MoseySusan said:

We can easily meet the 350 new topics metric when we leverage our experiences across topic fields. 
If there are +\- 30 people cycling through here throughout the day, and there are 13 topic fields, then each person need contribute only 11.667 new topics across all fields. That’s a topic per field rate of .879 per person. And I know all y’all have at least 11.7 instances of slightly less than fully-formed ideas to contribute. 
So, get to creating that content! 

You need a job.   

[MoseySusan]

1 minute ago, shootingstar said:

Please verify where you got those metrics. 

If you post this reply as a new topic, we’d be closer to our topic goal. 

[MoseySusan]

Just now, Wilburger said:

You need a job.   

Wait, what?! I thought as a Cafe influencer I get a substantial kick-back. 

[Kzoo]

You gave me a headache.

[maddmaxx ★]

350 new topics (implying 350 new threads) or 350 posts?  Engineering types want to know if the parameter is real or simply pulled out of thin air.  (not spoken like a sailor).

[MoseySusan]

4 minutes ago, maddmaxx said:

350 new topics (implying 350 new threads) or 350 posts?  Engineering types want to know if the parameter is real or simply pulled out of thin air.  (not spoken like a sailor).

It’s “posts.” I need a precise definition because I thought that means new threads. You’re saying it includes replies. 

[maddmaxx ★]

2 minutes ago, MoseySusan said:

It’s “posts.” I need a precise definition because I thought that means new threads. You’re saying it includes replies. 

We do 350 posts most days.  If it was 350 threads yesterday would be 7 or more pages long.

[MoseySusan]

10 minutes ago, maddmaxx said:

We do 350 posts most days.  If it was 350 threads yesterday would be 7 or more pages long.

Ok. Revised protocol: 

53 minutes ago, MoseySusan said:

We can easily meet the 350 new posts metric when we leverage our experiences across topic fields. 
If there are +\- 30 people cycling through here throughout the day, and there are 13 topic fields, then each person need contribute only 11.667 new posts across all fields. That’s a post per field rate of .879 per person. And I know all y’all have at least 11.7 instances of slightly less than fully-formed ideas to contribute. 
So, get to creating that content! 

 

[maddmaxx ★]

Purfekt.

[MoseySusan]

2 minutes ago, maddmaxx said:

Purfekt.

Easily .87.