Parsnip Totin Jack ★ Posted January 24 Share #1 Posted January 24 I read an article today that the “neutral site” solution developed by the NFL in response to if Kansas City and Buffalo both reached the AFC championship who gets home field advantage? The article said that the NFL is exploring making these games played in alternate sites as the league would benefit from bidding wars among host cities, the league would control ticket and luxury suite sales creating in effect, two more Super Bowls, which is a big cash cow for the league. What are your thoughts? Discus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razors Edge ★ Posted January 24 Share #2 Posted January 24 Stupid. What's the point of earning home field advantage? On the plus side, they could only play the games in warm climates, so there is a chance I would actually attend one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now