Jump to content

Alright...you guys got me thinking


petitepedal

Recommended Posts



38 minutes ago, Ralphie said:

My eyephone is enough for me. It surruptisly secretly tracks steps. 

I have a monkey on my back that does the same thing 

  • Heart 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, maddmaxx said:

Don't spend money you don't need to for name.

Garmin data, though. GPS map including color-coded effort level. And the Connect feature lets me share activity data with mr. and my step-son in Phoenix, who trains to hike/climb 14k mountains. I’d connect with others here, too. 👊🏼I’m going for a ride today. 

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MoseySusan said:

Garmin data, though. GPS map including color-coded effort level. And the Connect feature lets me share activity data with mr. and my step-son in Phoenix, who trains to hike/climb 14k mountains. I’d connect with others here, too. 👊🏼I’m going for a ride today. 

"Ecosystems" matter. Support matters. Good software and good hardware matter.  

I don't get paid by Garmin or Apple, but they are the gold standard.  Garmin is agnostic - Windows, Apple, Linus, whatever.  It just works and works well.  But, if you're in the Apple world already, the Watch is packed with features that "just work".

  • Heart 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, petitepedal said:

Well @MoseySusan mostly....about getting a new fitness tracker/ watch...I used my fit bit religiously back when..but it was one that attached to my clothes..not a watch..

So hand out your opinions here :dontknow:

Such watches are good for a lot of people.

Not for me in terms of weight loss and being out of shape, because its not the total amount of movement, it's how long I do the movement continuously or with very short rests. So I just need the stopwatch function on my Timex Ironman watch.

Studies by Covert Bailey at MIT in the '90's (he had a PBS health show) and by the ongoing Harvard Medical School Nurses Study show that walking less than 40 minutes at a time does NOT trigger an out-of-shape body into producing fat-burning and fat transporting biochemicals, so when I walk Jake, I make sure I have 2 miles + a little extra to hit at least 40 minutes.  For bicycling, the Harvard Nurses Study found 15 minutes to be the triggering point vs Bailey's 20 minutes.

Your body's pain and escape reflexes keep making carb-burning processes perform at 100% even when you're out of shape, but then your body burns carbs instead of fat when you exercise while not doing enough to trigger fat-burning processes.

Bailey says there is no such thing as a "slow metabolism."  That just seems to be the case when you're not getting in enough continuous exercise to trigger fat-burning.

According to Bailey's book Smart Exercise:

1504330193_p100(1of3).JPG.b7c09ee43944465533031c6303aeb8e6.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Razors Edge said:

"Ecosystems" matter. Support matters. Good software and good hardware matter.  

I don't get paid by Garmin or Apple, but they are the gold standard.  Garmin is agnostic - Windows, Apple, Linus, whatever.  It just works and works well.  But, if you're in the Apple world already, the Watch is packed with features that "just work".

I have a number of Garmin products. Not a fan. They are clunky as shit. I like my Coros.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Razors Edge said:

Do tell!

Molly_Silicone1_928x928.png?v=1668207494

I have the Apex premium. Easy to use. Battery life is great. I might charge it once a week. It tracks all forms of skiing. It is more intuitive than any Garmin product I have ever used.

My only complaints, The band lasted less than one year. I replaced it with a nylon band that seems much more durable. The backlight is dark. You have to tap the button to brighten the face. That is the trade-off for the long battery life. 

BLAGRE.jpg

 

Screenshot (4).png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I would get a fitness tracker for anything.

I took off my cyclometer from my bike...about 25 yrs. ago. I found myself gettin' far too obsessed by  numbers:  it was spoiling my enjoyment of cycling by tracking my mileage too closely or how quickly I got to a certain destination.  I truly was tracking daily for about lst 5 years:  I kept a journal and made notes on weather/whatever.  

It was great when returning to cycling @32 yrs. after not cycling since I was 21 yrs. old.  I needed that powerful motivator to see my progress, especially mileage. It was a great endurance training tool for me, especially when becoming fit enough to do loaded cycle touring on multi-wk. trips with dearie.

But later, on days I didn't bike much, it pulled me down psychologically. So I stopped looking at my numbers.

Since then, I do have a general sense of cycling distance for routes I use often in 3 CAnadian cities where I've lived each for various years. (which I got from dearie since he still tracked his mileage).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Garmin 735 XT. I got it for duathlons. A Forerunner 230 (?) can do all the same basics for significantly less money. 
The reason I didn’t get an Apple Watch is it wouldn’t readily connect to a cadence meter and NOT to an HR strap simultaneously. Many of those items mean nothing to most other people. I still kick around getting an Apple Watch so I don’t need to run with my phone if I want music. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...