Jump to content

Question from an 'old' man


sheep_herder

Recommended Posts

As opposed to suicide where the death was an intentional act it’s an accidental death or by homicide where the act was committed by another.  The deceased intended to take the drug but not a fatal dose.

Probably only matters from an investigative and maybe insurance stand point.... Dead is dead.

  • Heart 3
  • Awesome 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChrisL said:

As opposed to suicide where the death was an intentional act it’s an accidental death or by homicide where the act was committed by another.  The deceased intended to take the drug but not a fatal dose.

So maybe it should be officially listed as "unintentional death by drug overdose" instead of "accidental", which is what happens if a tree falls on your head.

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Road Runner said:

So maybe it should be officially listed as "unintentional death by drug overdose" instead of "accidental", which is what happens if a tree falls on your head.

II think the question really is, who is they?

The only cause of death that matters is what the coroner indicates.   Everything else is just empty words...  “They” can say whatever they want...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ChrisL said:

II think the question really is, who is they?

The only cause of death that matters is what the coroner indicates.   Everything else is just empty words...  “They” can say whatever they want...

All I see is what I read on the web or in the papers, so not sure who 'they' are, but assume they are quoting from the coroner's report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ChrisL said:

II think the question really is, who is they?

The only cause of death that matters is what the coroner indicates.   Everything else is just empty words...  “They” can say whatever they want...

Yep - my thoughts exactly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, sheep_herder said:

All I see is what I read on the web or in the papers, so not sure who 'they' are, but assume they are quoting from the coroner's report.

I would doubt many in the press or bloggers bother to read the coroner’s report. I think “likely drug overdose” is the conclusion reached at the scene and carried forward, unless something to contradict that gets announced after the autopsy. The “accidental” tag gets thrown in to differential from suicide.

Three guys died this week near me, accidental fentanyl overdoses. Apparently they went to an apartment after a club, and someone cut into a bag of what was believed to be cocaine and offered “bumps” off the end of his knife. It wasn’t cocaine. Which has me wondering what happened to cutting drugs with an inert substance, if you’re trying to maximize profits? Why use something that is going to most likely kill your clients? Fentanyl is so freaking toxic, it’s not like you can make weak heroin seem better if you use just a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...