Jon KITguy

Is easier to connect with me for Kazakstan wife. Safe for long haul as she will leave you after dirty talk day. Once has papers no need to be pain in ass.

Is advance on part of taxes you pay this year. If don't want to play in program you send back. If not you pay this and more later to your government. You message me and I send you address for money and fix everything so you don't owe.

Jon, your favorite Kazakstan IT guy here. No need for bit coin. I take all your currencys anytime. Squair Wheels hakster is friend. You just send $25 american or same in other moneys by giving me your bank statement and I will say to heem knock it off bad guy. Your friend Jon

Whoo boy. You not know how good you got it. In Kasakhstan workers get sceen by KNB or Қазақстан Республикасы Ұлттық Қауіпсіздік Комитеті, to you. Hour long screen is you good guy, ok for return to work. I, Jon, your friendly Kazakhstan IT guy lucky to work for me not others. No screen.

Is such site as this lush with space for importexport warehouse? I have friends in Kazakhstan who much like to help Jon bring business more to america. Friends are seeing to obtain web site and might share such a glorious place.

You smart man. Not take loan from stranger when your friend Jon can take care of your cash trouble quick yes. Please you contact Jon your friendly IT guy and I will fix everything. I do deposit from here right into your bank. Send number and how much an I fix.

Jon here, your friendly Kazakstani IT guy. You call number and get help. My friend Ernesto in Miami is much help with problem. Say you know me and he do you good.

I have many movies with much comedy. If you like I send you many from my import export facility for storage here in Kazakhstan. I'm nice guy so I give them to you gravitas. You pay freight and the party is on me. Send PM for how I get your freight money and I am your movie friend.

You have good story on us yes. We like you very much.

Not a sock, but haven't come here that often. Thanks for the birthday wishes.

The cost of a policy started at an older age will be much higher. Remember the risk pooling concept. You can't be free when young and expect to get in later at the same price as others. The insurance industry is based on that concept of risk pooling. They are not in the business of giving money away to people who have not paid in till they need it. In addition unless you are willing to leave out a large segment of the population this "established career" thing is a bit vague. Yes, that means that you fund the poor as well as yourself if you have a good job. You can adopt universal "insurance" if you wish but you will be paying the same moneys into a tax coffer instead of to an insurance company. We are still discussing the insurance factor, not the health care factor.

I'll repeat my previous post. Nobody can. The cost of a catastrophic but curable disease is astronomical and well beyond the ability of almost anyone to pay for themselves. Are you thinking that most people would have in excess of, for arguments sake, $750,000 dollars to spend on a health problem over and above their other living expenses. Again, this is the concept of risk pooling that the insurance industry is built on.

Health care and health insurance are two different things. At the moment the only thing being argued over in the halls of Washington is health insurance.

I don't think that most people understand the insurance concept. Insurance consists of pooling the risks and it works where the downside is so bad that usually the victim cannot cover the expenses by themselves. Most people given those circumstances would be willing to pay a little every year if they can be safe when something really bad happens. The pay outs however are large enough that it requires a significant pay in to keep the business afloat. In former decades there were clauses written into insurance that required you to carry the policy for x years before a claim could be made for specific things. In addition, no insurance company could afford to write a policy for a new policy holder who had, for example, cancer as an existing condition. How could insurance companies survive if someone was allowed to join suddenly just as something bad was happening after not joining when the good times rolled. Along came Obamacare where everyone was covered by law. Well, under those conditions a trade off was made in that everyone had to take part during the good times as well. The failure of that mandate would be the death of any possibility that the insurance plan would work otherwise. It is fantastically expensive to pay for a cancer patient and doing so requires that the costs be shared by many people who do not have cancer. It doesn't matter if that cancer strikes someone old or young. As this thread implies, you can reduce the overall costs by removing older people from the insurance plan. It seems to be a very popular idea with the young who view themselves as immortal. What do you think will happen when they turn 65, find themselves suddenly sick and without insurance. I guess we could call that the establishment of death camps. You get to a certain age and you lose all your protection. If you think you can save enough to pay your own way after a certain age............you can't. The tables show that people who pay into insurance companies, a plan akin to a mandatory savings plan, on average do not get back what they pay in. Some do however and that's why people join insurance pools. It's a lot like buying a warranty. For a disclaimer, I work in the Insurance industry for a company that I will not name on the internet.

Where would you relocate?