Square Wheels Posted October 2, 2013 Share #1 Posted October 2, 2013 So we all know the observer effect part of the Heisenberg principle that essentially says that measurements of certain systems cannot be made without affecting the systems. Does something similar exist for asking a person a question? Does the mere act of asking a question change the answer to the question? Do we temper our responses based on what we want the asker to know of us? Or what we want the world to know of us? Is this is true, then all conversation is pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted October 2, 2013 Share #2 Posted October 2, 2013 Depends on the person, some people definitely do this. Others, like myself, lack the filter and forethought (ADD is fun) so you get the straight answer, whether you want to hear it or not. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted October 2, 2013 Share #3 Posted October 2, 2013 no, the Uncertainty principle applies to making measurements of very small things like subatomic particles it doesn't apply to abstract ideas like understanding a human response to a question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Indy Posted October 2, 2013 Share #4 Posted October 2, 2013 And in person, I'm actually more reserved and quite because I know I tend to put my foot in my mouth. In this format, it allows me to review what I want to say (though not always good at it) before submitting my response. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsharr ★ Posted October 2, 2013 Share #5 Posted October 2, 2013 If we are talking to women, then conversation is not pointless, as we can look at their boobs. If we are talking to men, conversation is not pointless, because we can talk about boobs or sports. I prefer the Completion Backwards Principle. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Wheels Posted October 2, 2013 Author Share #6 Posted October 2, 2013 no, the Uncertainty principle applies to making measurements of very small things like subatomic particles it doesn't apply to abstract ideas like understanding a human response to a question. I agree, I was just just prefacing the thought with it and asked "Does something similar exist for asking a person a question?". Maybe we can name that principle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randomguy Posted October 2, 2013 Share #7 Posted October 2, 2013 Much of human interaction is formalized to an extent, so if you take the content out, the interaction is still about 90% the same. Really, most people really just want to hear themselves talk. I like to hear myself talk, and I only get upset if I bore myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nate Posted October 2, 2013 Share #8 Posted October 2, 2013 you can extrapolate the idea to human conversations, I think that people can only answer in as much as their perception allows. Basically, I don't believe that we are absoute authorites about ourselves I also believe that people will say any damned thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olas Nah Posted October 2, 2013 Share #9 Posted October 2, 2013 You have to ask that, after the existence of EPG has been verified by science? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now