Jump to content

this was entertaining


bikeman564™
 Share

Recommended Posts

I wish he'd have done it with triangle legs in whole numbers.  It's like he needed the sq.rt. of 3 so he could get things to cancel out nice and pretty.

Those mathematicians hate it when you use something like 1.732 in place of sq.rt. of 3 or 3.14159 instead of pi because it's not the "pure" answer.

  • Awesome 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MickinMD said:

I wish he'd have done it with triangle legs in whole numbers.  It's like he needed the sq.rt. of 3 so he could get things to cancel out nice and pretty.

Those mathematicians hate it when you use something like 1.732 in place of sq.rt. of 3 or 3.14159 instead of pi because it's not the "pure" answer.

Or they will”simplify” some goofy number like 12 sq root of 50 to 20 sq root of 12 or something not much different. I can see that maybe if it is snot simplest terms, but with computers who gives a crap?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MickinMD said:

I wish he'd have done it with triangle legs in whole numbers.  It's like he needed the sq.rt. of 3 so he could get things to cancel out nice and pretty.

Those mathematicians hate it when you use something like 1.732 in place of sq.rt. of 3 or 3.14159 instead of pi because it's not the "pure" answer.

like 2/3 in lieu of .6666? :D I'm not pure, but I do like pi

image.png.6a3e9b82bb794e4100cf3267b4008b55.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...