Jump to content

Influenza pandemic of 1918


Airehead

Recommended Posts

The epidemic of 1918 was a direct result of sending so many young men overseas during WWI.  They picked up flu viruses that were strange to people in the US and for which they had little or no immunity.  With so many people traveling all over the world these days, it is unlikely that a similar event would occur.

  • Heart 3
  • Awesome 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Road Runner said:

The epidemic of 1918 was a direct result of sending so many young men overseas during WWI.  They picked up flu viruses that were strange to people in the US and for which they had little or no immunity.  With so many people traveling all over the world these days, it is unlikely that a similar event would occur.

I am going to have to give you the Rick Henderson Harrison History Award for this one!  :D

 

  • Heart 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Road Runner said:

The epidemic of 1918 was a direct result of sending so many young men overseas during WWI.  They picked up flu viruses that were strange to people in the US and for which they had little or no immunity.  With so many people traveling all over the world these days, it is unlikely that a similar event would occur.

I am not so sure about that.  In NYC, everyone travels here from every part of the globe, and they bring their own new types of PRI with them.  Bunches of people catch whatever African, Spanish, or Klingon pox gets brought in.  More than likely, it will start here and spread to your neck of the woods within days.

People do know much more about hygiene now, and virology, but just as everything adapts, there will be a culling before the adaptation.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RalphWaldoMooseworth said:

I am going to have to give you the Rick Henderson History Award for this one!  :D

 

I posted a thread about the 1918 flu epidemic a while back and about how people, or history seems to have forgotten about it.  I forget the numbers, but IIRC, it seems like more people died in the 1918 epidemic than from all wars the US has ever fought.

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Road Runner said:

I posted a thread about the 1918 flu epidemic a while back and about how people, or history seems to have forgotten about it.  I forget the numbers, but it seems like more people died in the 1918 epidemic than from all wars the US has ever fought.

I definitely don;t remember it from high school.  In fact, I don't remember much modern history being covered there at all, like past 1900 or so.  Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dirtyhip said:

Critical differences today vs. 1918.  Vaccines and medical science has evolved.  Get your flu shot.   Wash your hands.  Exercise, sleep enough and eat well.

Lots of people at work have been ill already.  I am trying my best to stay strong.  So far, so good.

WRONG!  Ok, part of it is right, but the flu shot is well below 50% effective most years.  You are also forgetting that large numbers of people who can't afford insurance also work 3 jobs and are often preparing the food you eat in restaurants, and they simply cannot afford to take time off work.  They are sneezing and wiping their hands on their pants, then grabbing your plate and bringing it out to you.  They some of those now sick customers go to the hospital and give it to K, who would like a little action, thank you very much, before he starts to feel sick and then you already have it, too.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Randomguy said:

 In NYC, everyone travels here from every part of the globe, and they bring their own new types of PRI with them.  Bunches of people catch whatever African, Spanish, or Klingon pox gets brought in.

This is what helps us build up immunities to foreign strains of disease.  Before WWI, people did not travel very much and were much more isolated and more vulnerable to different strains of the flu.  This was especially true regarding North America/Europe/Asia.  Today, we are regularly exposed to foreign viruses and we develop anti-bodies to protect us.

We are also a lot smarter about these things than people were a hundred years ago and it is unlikely that we would allow anything resembling the 1918 event to reoccur..

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Road Runner said:

This is what helps us build up immunities to foreign strains of disease.  Before WWI, people did not travel very much and were much more isolated and more vulnerable to different strains of the flu.  This was especially true regarding North America/Europe/Asia.  Today, we are regularly exposed to foreign viruses and we develop anti-bodies to protect us.

We are also a lot smarter about these things than people were a hundred years ago and it is unlikely that we would allow anything resembling the 1918 event to reoccur..

The report found that, in addition to being airborne, a pathogen with the potential to cause a global pandemic disaster would likely have the following traits:

  • It would be contagious during the "incubation period," before people show any symptoms, or when people have only mild symptoms.
  • It would be a microbe that most people are not immune to, so there would be a large population of susceptible human hosts.
  • It wouldn't have an existing treatment or prevention method.
  • It would have a "low but significant" fatality rate.

 

Although the final trait may sound surprising, Adalja noted that a pathogen doesn't have to have a high fatality rate, or kill the majority of people infected, to cause majority societal disruptions. "It just has to make a lot of people sick," he told Live Science. (A pathogen with a high fatality rate could kill too many people too quickly, and therefore run out of "hosts" to spread further, the report noted.)

Indeed, the infamous "Spanish" influenza pandemic of 1918 had a fatality rate of just 2.5 percent, but because it infected hundreds of millions of people, it caused an estimated 50 million deaths, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In addition, according to something called the "host density threshold theorem" a virus that kills too many people will "run out of susceptible hosts and be extinguished," the report said.

The report also found that a group of viruses known as RNA viruses have the most potential to cause a global pandemic disaster, in part because these viruses mutate more easily than other types do. This group includes well-known viruses such as the flu (influenza) and SARS, but also common cold viruses, such as enteroviruses and rhinoviruses, as well as respiratory syncytial virus.

While the flu has received a lot of attention for its ability to cause pandemics, many other viruses in this group have not. There's "a whole host of viral families that get very little attention when it comes to pandemic preparedness," Adalja said.

Historically, authorities have prepared for pandemics by focusing on a list of "usual suspects" — diseases that have caused outbreaks in the past, such as the flu and SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome), or those that could be used as biological weapons. But this approach doesn't account for pathogens that aren't currently known or haven't historically caused outbreaks, the researchers said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Randomguy said:

WRONG!  Ok, part of it is right, but the flu shot is well below 50% effective most years.  You are also forgetting that large numbers of people who can't afford insurance also work 3 jobs and are often preparing the food you eat in restaurants, and they simply cannot afford to take time off work.  They are sneezing and wiping their hands on their pants, then grabbing your plate and bringing it out to you.  They some of those now sick customers go to the hospital and give it to K, who would like a little action, thank you very much, before he starts to feel sick and then you already have it, too.

Don't eat in restaurants.  I rarely do this.  

Yeah, we both work in places with a high probability of flu exposure.  LOL, on Halloween, I was giving out candy.  This little kid coughed right in my face.  Afterward he continued to cough a lot,  Yup, exposure.

In regards to the vaccine, some years it is not the best strain.  I really don't have a lot of bad side effects from it.  This year, my husband and I both felt a little icky for about a day afterward.  Still worth it.  Someone at work had the full blown flu.  I worked directly with him the day before he fell ill.  I even touched his papers that he had pawed over.  Flu shot?  Strong immune system?  Not sure.  Maybe both helped me.  I have been dosing with essential oils a lot.  There is one specifically for bacteria and immune boosting.  That is my best friend this season.  I think most of the time people blame the shot for flu, when they already were coming down with it and didn't know it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Road Runner said:

The epidemic of 1918 was a direct result of sending so many young men overseas during WWI.  They picked up flu viruses that were strange to people in the US and for which they had little or no immunity.  With so many people traveling all over the world these days, it is unlikely that a similar event would occur.

except for you know.....ebola 

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Dirtyhip said:

I think most of the time people blame the shot for flu, when they already were coming down with it and didn't know it.

I don't think anyone blames the shot for the flu, not normal people, anyway.  I just think it doesn't work for me, and I have flu like symptoms for a week when I get the shot, then typically get the flu in addition at some point.  I would rather have those symptoms once than twice.

I can't see ever getting the flu shot again.  You don't eat at restaurants, but the people that stock grocery shelves do, and grocery stockers are well known for never washing their hands in Oregon.  :P

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Randomguy said:

I don't think anyone blames the shot for the flu, not normal people, anyway.  I just think it doesn't work for me, and I have flu like symptoms for a week when I get the shot, then typically get the flu in addition at some point.  I would rather have those symptoms once than twice.

I can't see ever getting the flu shot again.  You don't eat at restaurants, but the people that stock grocery shelves do, and grocery stockers are well known for never washing their hands in Oregon.  :P

Who knows, maybe all that bacteria is why I am so healthy.  

I just made some soap with my On Guard essential oil in it.  It acts in an anti bacterial way, but without things like triclosan in it.  Smells really good too.  I need a better soap mold.  I am reusing things for that, but it is not ideal.  Prone to leaks in the mold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Airehead said:

Could it happen again?  

It's possible but less likely because a majority of people in advanced nations get flu shots each year.

Additionally, a study that was on Johns Hopkins Hospital's website but I can't find it now said that if everyone had the pneumonia vaccine back in 1918, the deaths from the Spanish Flu Epidemic in 1918-19 would have been less than half of what actually happened.

If you look closely at the statistics, relative few people listed as dying of the flu actually die from the flu itself. Their systems are weakened and they mostly die of pneumonia.

I personally made sure I had the two pneumonia shots, 5 years apart, that are supposed to be good for life for preventing virtually 100% of the bacteria that cause pneumonia.  That and my annual October flu shot doesn't guarantee anything, but every little bit helps.

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... in China just reported in last 2 wks., there were 2 cases of people with bubonic plague..a medieval plague disease that has resurfaced again.

As for avoiding restaurants...one way is to eat cooked food for starters and perhaps if one is so concerned, to stick to places where one feels comfortable as a regular customer.  I'm willing to bet a lot of national chain restaurants try to be strict on complying to food safety.  a franchise can't afford to taint the reputation of their national firm.

I will add the municipal water treatment places....the security is strict.  Even to other employees working in other depts.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...I just gave away my book on the pandemic of 1918 last week, to the Friends of the Library.

51gRkSDo59L._SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_ 

 

Crosby's closing chapters were interesting, because currently nobody has much data on what that influenza strain was, or how it evolved.  There seems to be some association with an agricultural complex that includes pigs (and possibly cows. IIRC). The nature of viruses was almost unknown at that point in time, and a lot of the research on viruses came much later on.  They available equipment for observation needed to evolve before the work could be done on viruses. The guys who more or less figured this strain of influenza out were using ferrets as research animals, and they got lucky, to some extent. We've already had a global pandemic similar in nature in our lifetimes called AIDS.  Not sure of the total death toll from AIDS so far, but it continues climbing.

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2019 at 7:41 AM, Road Runner said:

The epidemic of 1918 was a direct result of sending so many young men overseas during WWI.  They picked up flu viruses that were strange to people in the US and for which they had little or no immunity.  With so many people traveling all over the world these days, it is unlikely that a similar event would occur.

...the Spanish flu was already here.  What WW 1 did was to cluster large groups of the vulnerable population (young men in their 20's and 30's) in crowded living conditions and miserable accommodations.  Some of the percentage of troop transport deaths by ship from the US to the war in Europe are astonishing.  And there was not much in the way of effective treatment, or even an understanding of the causation of the disease.  Anyway, some histories give the flu pandemic as one of the essential causes for the end of hostilities in WW 1.

  • Heart 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 11/30/2019 at 9:36 AM, Airehead said:

Could it happen again?  

Ok, all you smug bastards who say it couldn’t happen again, we have a perfect example of how it most certainly will happen again (and might be getting going right now). 
 

I am not saying that this is going to end up like the 1918 flu, but people do easily get overconfident about human ability to tell nature how nature will act without thinking things through. 

  • Hugs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't avoid restaurants at any time during flu season.  We make sure it's cooked food. Cooked veggies, etc.  And if those veggies are shipped from far away, then all more the reason this food is cooked. Yes, that means avoiding salads if one is so concerned at this time.

For myself personally, I actually only seem to eat fresh raw veggie salad...ie. maybe 3-4 times per month.  At home, I'm not the person making salads.  He is.  Which then amounts for me, salads maybe 4-5 times per month or less at home.  Rest of the time, the veggies are cooked.  I've always been like this....for decades.

I'm talking about just the flu. 

So soup at a restaurant...yum.

So the objective is... do your fresh veggie, fruits shopping now where you know the sources are still "safe".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2019 at 9:36 AM, Airehead said:

Could it happen again?  

Some virus that is asymptomatic for a couple weeks but contagious through the air before it kills you could easily spread widely before it is identified.  It will happen and the flu shot will be of no help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2019 at 9:45 AM, Road Runner said:

My grandfather on my mother's side lost his first wife to the flu of 1918. 

Millions died.  A huge catastrophe in US history that is seldom mentioned or much thought about anymore..

GGFo2 (Father of Mother of father of 2Far) died in flu of 1918

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/30/2019 at 8:33 PM, MickinMD said:

It's possible but less likely because a majority of people in advanced nations get flu shots each year.

Flu shots are formulated based on what the CDC thinks will be the prevalent flu strain(s) that year.  The flu shot is really just a "best guess" of what is going to be a problem ailment.  A bacteria strain that causes a global pandemic most likely wouldn't be predicted by the CDC so the flu shot would be useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, donkpow said:

The advantage in a flu shot that does not target the current virus is in the fact that the inoculation will prepare the body to fight viruses in general.

Just like with antibiotics, the disadvantage is over use of antiviral medications can result in resistant strains of the virus.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...